Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

coala Language Server #492

Closed
jayvdb opened this issue Mar 19, 2018 · 6 comments · Fixed by #495
Closed

coala Language Server #492

jayvdb opened this issue Mar 19, 2018 · 6 comments · Fixed by #495
Assignees

Comments

@jayvdb
Copy link
Member

jayvdb commented Mar 19, 2018

https://github.com/coala/coala-vs-code is effectively a Language Server, but with a reduced scope as it is targeted only at vs-code.

It needs to be completed and polished so it can be added to https://langserver.org/

@jayvdb
Copy link
Member Author

jayvdb commented Mar 19, 2018

One component would be docker-ising it, possibly with several dockers for different language sets which include the relevant linters for that language.

e.g. the Python LS at https://github.com/palantir/python-language-server#feature-providers , which uses various tools, and we would use coala for the linting functionality

@jayvdb
Copy link
Member Author

jayvdb commented Mar 19, 2018

The core of this project would be coala/coala-vs-code#3 I think .

@jayvdb
Copy link
Member Author

jayvdb commented Mar 19, 2018

coala/coala-vs-code#4 is a possible part of this project, but a 'daemon mode' for coala-core is probably a separate project in itself. @Makman2 , how flexible is the internals of coala to being driven (files pushed onto the queue to be processed) from an external source?

@gaocegege
Copy link
Member

I will write a description soon.

@gaocegege
Copy link
Member

#495

PTAL

@jayvdb
Copy link
Member Author

jayvdb commented Mar 23, 2018

Closed with #495

@jayvdb jayvdb closed this as completed Mar 23, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants