-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 244
Response exceeded maximum allowed length #239
Comments
Here is our output from |
That's probably the stdout/stderr of the failure being larger than the size It could also be some other message response being too long... @cppforlife got any other ideas? On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Sai To Yeung [email protected]
|
With that release, on this particular box, we are able to reproduce this error. Our next steps are to remove |
You said bosh cli plugin? I'm a dummy. On Feb 25, 2015, at 8:46 AM, JT Archie [email protected] wrote: With that release, on this particular box, we are able to reproduce this Our next steps are to remove .blobs and .bosh/cache and try again. — |
This is definitely stdout/stderr going over the limit due to how we use tar (verbose mode) in the Agent. Real problem here is that it fails to untar. This could be either due to invalid package cache or for some reason compilation stage did not successfully tar up the package. Since this is bosh-lite best way to go about it is to blow away that deployment and cf-release from the Director. |
We'll adjust bosh-agent eventually to no log everything from tar command. |
We are able to reproduce this error again. The strange part of it is that we can produce it on our CI machine, but unable to reproduce it on our dev machine, where the deployment of Bosh Lite and CF worked perfectly. |
We were able to reproduce this bug by running this errand:
This was on a bosh-init deployed vSphere director, so not sure this is necessarily a bosh-lite problem. It looks like the nats handler does not publish any of the message if it gets an error from the PerformHandler: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/bosh-agent/blob/fcb52b4f1aeae2c0c48e76c374b6f80354cbece5/mbus/nats_handler.go#L161-L164 |
Hi,
We tried deploying a trusty branch of CF-Release (https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-release/tree/trusty64-rootfs) and got the following error:
The full error log can be found here.
We've been able to successfully deploy before, and this is the first time we've seen this error message. What's causing this?
Thanks,
Sai To
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: