[pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate

[pre-commit-ci]

updates:

• github.com/astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit: v0.8.1 → v0.8.2

Summary by Sourcery

CI:

• Update the ruff-pre-commit hook from version v0.8.1 to v0.8.2 in the pre-commit configuration.

[semanticdiff-com]

Review changes with  

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This is an automated update of the pre-commit hooks configuration, specifically updating the ruff-pre-commit hook from version v0.8.1 to v0.8.2.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Update ruff-pre-commit hook version	Bump ruff-pre-commit version from v0.8.1 to v0.8.2	.pre-commit-config.yaml

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[what-the-diff]

PR Summary

• Upgraded ruff-pre-commit Hook Version
  The ruff-pre-commit hook, which helps ensure that code changes are optimized before they are committed, has been updated to a newer version (from v0.8.1 to v0.8.2). This update will likely grant us improvements in performance and reliability, leading to more streamlined and efficient coding processes.

[sourcery-ai]

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It seems to have been created by a bot (hey, pre-commit-ci[bot]!). We assume it knows what it's doing!

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

Action: SonarCloud

Failed stage: SonarCloud Scan [❌]

Failure summary: The action failed because there was an error while trying to retrieve the pull request with key 403. This resulted in an execution failure and the process completed with an exit code of 3.

Relevant error logs: 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 246: 16:39:36.225 INFO Check ALM binding of project 'cleder_fastkml' 247: 16:39:36.339 INFO Detected project binding: BOUND 248: 16:39:36.339 INFO Check ALM binding of project 'cleder_fastkml' (done) | time=114ms 249: 16:39:36.340 INFO Load project pull requests 250: 16:39:36.454 INFO Load project pull requests (done) | time=113ms 251: 16:39:36.456 INFO Load branch configuration 252: 16:39:36.457 INFO Github event: pull_request 253: 16:39:36.463 INFO Auto-configuring pull request 403 254: 16:39:36.599 ERROR Something went wrong while trying to get the pullrequest with key '403' 255: 16:39:36.924 INFO EXECUTION FAILURE 256: 16:39:36.925 INFO Total time: 7.318s 257: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 3.

---

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

---

The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

• Failed stage
• Failed test name
• Failure summary
• Relevant error logs

In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

/checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"

where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

Configuration options

• enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
• excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
• enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
• persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
• final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

[github-actions]

Failed to generate code suggestions for PR

[llamapreview]

Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

Review Status: Automated Review Skipped

Dear contributor,

Thank you for your Pull Request. LlamaPReview has analyzed your changes and determined that this PR does not require an automated code review.

Analysis Result:

PR only contains version updates and formatting changes

Technical Context:

Version and formatting changes detected, which include:

• Package version updates
• Dependency version changes
• Code formatting adjustments
• Whitespace modifications
• Structural formatting changes

We're continuously improving our PR analysis capabilities. Have thoughts on when and how LlamaPReview should perform automated reviews? Share your insights in our GitHub Discussions.

Best regards,
LlamaPReview Team

[github-actions]

Preparing review...

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (fbfcbe9) to head (38a4e80).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop      #403   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           74        74           
  Lines         6121      6121           
  Branches       151       151           
=========================================
  Hits          6121      6121           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.