Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Serpy doesn't support deserialization #1

Open
maroux opened this issue Jun 2, 2015 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #2
Open

Serpy doesn't support deserialization #1

maroux opened this issue Jun 2, 2015 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #2

Comments

@maroux
Copy link

maroux commented Jun 2, 2015

Serpy could easily be extended to support deserialization from dict back into Complex objects like Django objects. This would make it feature complete and a good candidate for replacing DRF fully. Is this something that's on the roadmap?

I realized I'm writing something similar to Serpy because I need faster serializer, but I also need deserialization. I can port my changes into Serpy.

maroux pushed a commit to maroux/serpy that referenced this issue Jun 3, 2015
- Added support for read-only fields
- Renamed `.data` to `.representation` (and added `.internal_value`) for better clarity
- Renamed `.to_value` to `.to_representation` (and added `to_internal_value`) for better clarity

TBD update documentation, fix benchmarks, update benchmarks

Fixes clarkduvall#1
@maroux maroux linked a pull request Jun 3, 2015 that will close this issue
maroux pushed a commit to maroux/serpy that referenced this issue Jun 3, 2015
- Added support for read-only fields
- Renamed `.data` to `.representation` (and added `.internal_value`) for better clarity
- Renamed `.to_value` to `.to_representation` (and added `to_internal_value`) for better clarity

TBD update documentation, fix benchmarks, update benchmarks

Fixes clarkduvall#1
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant