Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feeder vs Circuit #6

Open
Sveino opened this issue Sep 8, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Feeder vs Circuit #6

Sveino opened this issue Sep 8, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@Sveino
Copy link
Contributor

Sveino commented Sep 8, 2021

Issue No. 13_243

Description:
Feeder:
How to modelize a feeder as a collection of equipments powered by the same Feeder-switch.
It is a notion derived from connectivity, Swicthes positions, on which different set of rules (may differ from on utility to an other) are applied to define the spreading part of network concerned.

This is typical to Distribution networks, where networks are managed as radial.

  • Usually one Switch feeds a network this network part.

  • Open Switches serve as borderline with other network parts (used to rescue when a feeder-switch is down).

  • These 2 special points of the network part should be clearly identified and indicate what they are borders to.

  • To satisfy deferent detailed level applications, expressing the composition of the FEEDER should be possible at 2 detail-levels: Containers and elementary equipments.
    ** Containers: Substation,Line, VoltageLevel for undetailed definition.
    ** ConductingEquipments or ConnectivityNodes for detailed definition.

  • Feeders might be hierarchically subdivided (for Exemple a MV-Feeder, feeds/includes several LV subnetworks ).

Contact info:
J. FREMONT,
D. ILHAT

Group:
Core

Proposed Resolution:

Resurect the Circuit class (or name it as Feeder).
Define associations to its contents:
1- EquipmentContainer<-->Circuit
2- ConductingEquipment<---->Circuit

Based on release

Redmine Issue Tracking
https://redmine.ucaiug.org/issues/4989

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Open
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant