Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Plotting other structures onto MSM #5

Open
sonyahanson opened this issue May 18, 2015 · 6 comments
Open

Plotting other structures onto MSM #5

sonyahanson opened this issue May 18, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@sonyahanson
Copy link

I guess we need to check this a bit more thoroughly in general re: ensembler models, but currently have a basic question:

If I plot the first frame of run0-clone0.h5 is that equivalent to plotting the starting structure?

@kyleabeauchamp
Copy link
Collaborator

It's not exactly the same, but it should be close. This frame corresponds to the coordinates after equilibration, which involves some degree of structural relaxation.

@sonyahanson
Copy link
Author

Cool. So I did some exploration here, and there does seem to be some discrepancy. Hard to tell if there is some dynamics that's happening super fast or if it's because we're doing something wrong. Result fir Abl using first frame of run0-clone0 vs implicit refined 2HZ0 (starting structure based on RUN0/template.txt):
fig_abl_2hz0

@sonyahanson
Copy link
Author

Similar for Src:
fig_src_1fmk

@kyleabeauchamp
Copy link
Collaborator

Well, both points seem to lie inside a basin of high density, although the
src is strange that the the points are well-separated on the slowest
eigenfunction.

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:38 PM, sonyahanson [email protected]
wrote:

Similar for Src:
[image: fig_src_1fmk]
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/6333823/7693866/2f7bd11c-fda6-11e4-81a4-b51dda2bf4eb.png


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#5 (comment).

@jchodera
Copy link
Member

Would be cool if the data munging code could include the starting structures as the first structure in each trajectory.

@sonyahanson
Copy link
Author

After talking to Kyle it does seem like there was a ~10 ns equilibration before starting the simulation, which probably explains this difference.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants