We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
https://github.com/chengsoonong/crowdastro/tree/master/crowdastro/crowd
This would mean that we may need to tinker a bit with the interface, but it might be a tool that is of broader interest than just applying it to RGZ.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, I think we should. Generic crowd algorithms are notably different from astronomical applications. (Then again, it is _crowd_astro...)
If we do that, we should do it after the thesis, and we should also discuss the API.
Sorry, something went wrong.
I will explicitly tag issues with thesis if I think you should include it.
No branches or pull requests
https://github.com/chengsoonong/crowdastro/tree/master/crowdastro/crowd
This would mean that we may need to tinker a bit with the interface, but it might be a tool that is of broader interest than just applying it to RGZ.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: