Dependency Test Coverage Differences on Windows

[glasschef]

Chefspec 4.2.0 in Windows seems to treat coverage of dependencies differently than it does on other platforms. For the same cookbook on Windows and OS X and Linux:

Windows: https://gist.github.com/glasschef/dd0b7c2293a2bf413568

ChefSpec Coverage report generated...

  Total Resources:   19
  Touched Resources: 3
  Touch Coverage:    15.79%

Untouched Resources:

  chef_gem[di-ruby-lvm]              C:0
  yum_package[lvm2]                  C:0
  yum_package[s3cmd]                 C:0
  template[s3cfg]                    C:0
  yum_package[logrotate]             C:0
  directory[/etc/logrotate.d]        C:0
  template[/etc/logrotate.d/mongodb]   C:0
  yum_package[iptables]              C:0
  execute[rebuild-iptables]          C:0
  directory[/etc/iptables.d]         C:0
  template[/usr/sbin/rebuild-iptables]   C:0
  template[/etc/iptables.d/all_established]   C:0
  template[/etc/iptables.d/all_icmp]   C:0
  template[/etc/iptables.d/prefix]   C:0
  template[/etc/iptables.d/postfix]   C:0
  template[/etc/iptables.d/mongodb]   C:0

OS X: https://gist.github.com/glasschef/5e7e6c7ed464b98ee481

ChefSpec Coverage report generated...

  Total Resources:   3
  Touched Resources: 3
  Touch Coverage:    100.0%

You are awesome and so is your test coverage! Have a fantastic day

Existing issue in ChefSpec: chefspec/chefspec#594

[danielsdeleo]

Appears to be an upstream issue, will keep this ticket here to track getting the fix in once it becomes available.

[joelhandwell]

chefspec 4.3.0 was released on July 16th 2015 and I'm getting same result like Mac 100% and Windows 32%. Is there anyone getting same result?

[thommay]

Hey @joelhandwell @glasschef does this bug still occur (sorry it's 18 months later). If it does, can you provide a replication case in the form of the actual cookbook that shows the problem?
Thanks!