You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Useful run to use for designing more detailed QC metrics in the future
After cycle ~100 tile 1107 started giving poor quality data. This can be seen in many metrics including %Q30, ErrorRate, FWHM, %Aligned_R4, Phasing_R4, Prephasing_R4
Since the unidentified problem only affected a single tile, it had little impact on the overall average value of these metrics that are currently on the QC reports.
The failure of a single tile may not impact the overall data quality of a run, however it may be indicative of a systematic problem in the instrument. It might be necessary to track certain parameters longitudinally on a per-tile basis.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Useful run to use for designing more detailed QC metrics in the future
After cycle ~100 tile 1107 started giving poor quality data. This can be seen in many metrics including %Q30, ErrorRate, FWHM, %Aligned_R4, Phasing_R4, Prephasing_R4
Since the unidentified problem only affected a single tile, it had little impact on the overall average value of these metrics that are currently on the QC reports.
The failure of a single tile may not impact the overall data quality of a run, however it may be indicative of a systematic problem in the instrument. It might be necessary to track certain parameters longitudinally on a per-tile basis.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: