Integrate 2023 EIA 923 final release data

[e-belfer]

Overview

Closes #3902.

What problem does this address?

Integrates the final release of 2023 EIA 923 data, revised 2022 data and the September release of EIA 923 2024 monthly data.

What's changed in the data, and what have you changed?

2022 revision

The 2022 revision has the following changes:

• aer_fuel_type_code changed to mer_fuel_type_code in the data. As discussed in Integrate EIA 923 ER #3721, the aer and mer fuel type codes are equivalent, so this is mapped to the same column.
• the petcoke_stocks tab is removed

2023 final release

• One plant with EIA ID 6251 (South Texas Nuclear) has a huge spike in cooling water usage in April 2023, which explains the failure in the cooling water continuity. I'm bumping the outliers by 1, rather than adjusting the thresholds.

Data Integration Tasks

To-do list

Beta Give feedback

1. Make sure no mer_fuel_type_codes from 2022 are lost in the mapping, and re-map if needed
2. Resolve failing continuity checks for EIA cooling system monthly average changes
3. Resolve null columns in _out_eia__yearly_derived_generator_attributes

Documentation

Make sure to update relevant aspects of the documentation.

Tasks

Beta Give feedback

1. Update the release notes: reference the PR and related issues.
2. Update relevant Data Source jinja templates (see docs/data_sources/templates).
3. Update relevant table or source description metadata (see src/metadata).
4. Review and update any other aspects of the documentation that might be affected by this PR.

Testing

How did you make sure this worked? How can a reviewer verify this?

To-do list

Beta Give feedback

1. Run make pytest-coverage locally to ensure that the merge queue will accept your PR.
2. Review the PR yourself and call out any questions or issues you have.
3. For bigger ETL or data changes run the full ETL locally and then run the data validations using make pytest-validate.
4. Alternatively, run the build-deploy-pudl GitHub Action manually.

[aesharpe]

Looks good! Just some high-level Qs