Add assertions and workflow updates to debug ogr2ogr failure.

[zaneselvans]

PR Overview

Something is suddenly breaking our use of ogr2ogr in a subprocess to extract the Census DP1 GeoDataBase, but only in CI not locally. This PR is an attempt to debug why.

• Update tox-pytest workflow to use setup-micromamba and checkout@v4
• Add some assertions about the inputs & output paths involved in running ogr2ogr

PR Checklist

• Merge the most recent version of the branch you are merging into (probably dev).
• All CI checks are passing. Run tests locally to debug failures
• Make sure you've included good docstrings.
• For major data coverage & analysis changes, run data validation tests
• Include unit tests for new functions and classes.
• Defensive data quality/sanity checks in analyses & data processing functions.
• Update the release notes and reference reference the PR and related issues.
• Do your own explanatory review of the PR to help the reviewer understand what's going on and identify issues preemptively.

[zaneselvans]

Welp, all the input and output files and directories that we expect to be there are there, but for mysterious reasons the expected libabsl_cord.so shared library isn't being found. But it seems to work fine locally.

input = None, capture_output = True, timeout = None, check = True
popenargs = ([PosixPath('/home/runner/micromamba/envs/pudl-test/bin/ogr2ogr'), '/tmp/pytest-of-runner/pytest-0/pudl0/output/censusdp1tract.sqlite', '/tmp/tmpxktrwrjv/Profile-County_Tract.gdb'],)
kwargs = {'stderr': -1, 'stdout': -1}
process = <Popen: returncode: 127 args: [PosixPath('/home/runner/micromamba/envs/pudl-...>
stdout = b''
stderr = b'/home/runner/micromamba/envs/pudl-test/bin/ogr2ogr: error while loading shared libraries: libabsl_cord.so.2301.0.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory\n'
retcode = 127

[jdangerx]

Hmm, this libabsl seems to be from libabseil, and a new version got pushed up to conda over the weekend. Let me pin that to an older version and see if things work. If that doesn't fix it I'll look into a more interactive debugging approach than "push and hope."

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.0% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (b3567e5) 88.5% compared to head (9a89e6d) 88.5%.
Report is 4 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##             dev   #2849   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   88.5%   88.5%           
=====================================
  Files         90      90           
  Lines      10134   10139    +5     
=====================================
+ Hits        8978    8983    +5     
  Misses      1156    1156           

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
src/pudl/convert/censusdp1tract_to_sqlite.py	88.5% <100.0%> (+1.9%)	⬆️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.