You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The code is very helpful, and I'm just curious if it will be a more fair comparison if we run the CUP-SCP and dec-SCP both in a receding-horizon fashion to compare against the DMPC algorithm. If I understand correctly, the SCP algorithms are currently run in a fixed-length horizon
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From the top of my head I don't know how to make cup-SCP and dec-SCP receding-horizon. Wouldn't that just end up being something akin DMPC? Since this is used for offline trajectory generation only, the receding horizon part in DMPC is just a more efficient way to do computations, rather than being a method for online adaptation of the trajectory.
As for fair comparisons, I still believe comparing these three methods is fair: your are solving the same problem and you want to compare different optimization strategies to solve it. If you have any new algorithm in mind to solve the point-to-point problem, then that would also be fair to compare against.
Hi,
The code is very helpful, and I'm just curious if it will be a more fair comparison if we run the CUP-SCP and dec-SCP both in a receding-horizon fashion to compare against the DMPC algorithm. If I understand correctly, the SCP algorithms are currently run in a fixed-length horizon
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: