Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

question about the sequential convex programming implementation #6

Open
Jushan-Randy-Chen opened this issue Dec 8, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@Jushan-Randy-Chen
Copy link

Hi,

The code is very helpful, and I'm just curious if it will be a more fair comparison if we run the CUP-SCP and dec-SCP both in a receding-horizon fashion to compare against the DMPC algorithm. If I understand correctly, the SCP algorithms are currently run in a fixed-length horizon

@carlosluis
Copy link
Owner

Hi,

Sorry for the late reply.

From the top of my head I don't know how to make cup-SCP and dec-SCP receding-horizon. Wouldn't that just end up being something akin DMPC? Since this is used for offline trajectory generation only, the receding horizon part in DMPC is just a more efficient way to do computations, rather than being a method for online adaptation of the trajectory.

As for fair comparisons, I still believe comparing these three methods is fair: your are solving the same problem and you want to compare different optimization strategies to solve it. If you have any new algorithm in mind to solve the point-to-point problem, then that would also be fair to compare against.

Hope this helps!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants