Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DoD] Review and refine content with SMEs #4230

Closed
3 tasks done
Tracked by #4202
aagonzales opened this issue Aug 28, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed
3 tasks done
Tracked by #4202

[DoD] Review and refine content with SMEs #4230

aagonzales opened this issue Aug 28, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@aagonzales
Copy link
Member

aagonzales commented Aug 28, 2024

Accpectance criteria

  • Vet code content checklist with devs The code checklist (esp. the API best practices) is pretty heavy at the moment; also, the testing checklist could potentially be broken up into another section. Have them review and try to simplify it.

  • Vet design kit checklist with Juan and Rich This section is the most incomplete part of the checklist...probably because the Figma guild has it's own checklist for kit contributions and we're trying to kind of shorthand their checklist on our site. I think we need to decide whether we want to bring a shortened version of their checklist over here to the site, or just link out to it.

  • Refine the content per feedback

@aagonzales aagonzales changed the title [DoD] Review content with SMEs [DoD] Review and refine content with SMEs Aug 28, 2024
@aagonzales aagonzales moved this to ⏱ Backlog in Design System Aug 28, 2024
@laurenmrice laurenmrice added this to the 2024 Q3 milestone Aug 29, 2024
@laurenmrice laurenmrice moved this from ⏱ Backlog to 🏗 In Progress in Design System Sep 5, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 🏗 In Progress to ✅ Done in Design System Sep 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants