You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 12, 2019. It is now read-only.
The purpose of this epic is to track a proof of concept to figure out:
How can we come up with a common way to write requirements so our users can understand why choices were made about a component and our framework developers can understand what outcomes are expected?
How can we write tests to confirm all frameworks are in sync?
How can components share a common API and what's included?
Outcomes
Acceptance criteria (what's expected from component specifications with working examples)
Technical Steering Committee consensus (as a blocking means to implement the backlog)
Documented backlog (component priority, future efforts outside of proof of concept scope, etc.)
In Scope
Components:
Button (static component with many variants / modifiers)
Checkbox (repeatable pattern)
Icon (dependency on Carbon Elements, but still a component)
Modal (JavaScript and user interaction)
Specifications that may include:
Component requirements
Component tests
Component demo configs to use in tests (and in documentation?)
Component selectors object or some other means to map demo content to where that content is placed in templates?
Tooling to run spec verification tests
Out Scope
Shared reporting of each carbon-components-x's spec adherence
Component generate functions that inform carbon-components-x templating
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The purpose of this epic is to track a proof of concept to figure out:
Outcomes
In Scope
Out Scope
generate
functions that inform carbon-components-x templatingThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: