-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
microcloud init: failed to bind to any multicast udp port #254
Comments
Hi @myr4htw, can you please provide some more context and reproducer steps. At which point of the |
Hi, lookup_subnet: 10.216.50.0/24
I receive the error But multicast seems to be ok!? Please see the output of the commands netstat -gn and nc: root@stl-s-microcl1:~# netstat -gn lo 1 224.0.0.251 Test connection to the second server (microcl2): Test connection to the third server (microcl3): Hope that helps. Kind regards |
Make sure multicast is enabled on your network. MicroCloud uses mDNS for discovery and in your case tries to send to the multicast address There is also this issue which looks to be the same #134. |
Hi, micro1@stl-s-microcl1:~$ ip a Do you have any ideas? Kind regards |
I guess you are trying to ping the OVN virtual router from one of the LXD networks e.g. Can you reach the virtual router/gateway from an instance connected to the respective LXD network?
|
Hi, Kind regards
|
Could you please give me a description how I can test the network and how to see if it is ok or not? |
In the output of Now if you want to ping the public facing side of the virtual network you could try to ping From your messages I still don't see the exact error you are facing, please elaborate on this. |
Hi, 134.96.216.206 is not reachable by ping. We've got 3 ubuntu servers. These are virtual machines in our RedHat Virtualization. micro1@stl-s-microcl1:/etc/default$ ip a In the MicroCloud init process we selected the addresses 10.216.50.200 - 204 for internal traffic Then the cluster was built successfully. Kind regards |
Okay so from what I can see this configuration looks ok. Maybe let's first check it the other way around. When you deploy a LXD instance within the MicroCloud, can it reach the internet and/or gateway?
This should print something like this:
|
Hi, micro1@stl-s-microcl1:~$ lxc launch ubuntu:jammy c1 |
This looks to be an issue related to domain name resolution on your machine and not LXD. |
root@stl-s-microcl1:~# nslookup cloud-images.ubuntu.com ** server can't find cloud-images.ubuntu.com: SERVFAIL |
Hello, Kind regards |
You can find the networking requirements listed on this page https://canonical-microcloud.readthedocs-hosted.com/en/latest/explanation/microcloud/#explanation-networking. Have you managed to get DNS working? |
No, the problem is the lack of internet connection... |
When launching an instance, downloading the image would be done through |
No, I can't. |
That seems to be a problem yes. Please check the link I have posted earlier. For the creation of the MicroCloud/LXD cluster and the download of images the first network interface is used. The second network interface is dedicated for connecting OVN to the uplink network. That is egress traffic originating from LXD instances deployed in MicroCloud. |
The network the first interfaces belongs to has no internet connection. My understanding was it is only used for the communication between the MicroCloud Servers. That is why we chose this internal network. |
Hello,
I try to set up MicroCloud with 3 virtual machines. Every machine has 2 network interfaces: one is assigned an IP address, the other is without IP address:
2: ens3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:1a:4a:16:01:96 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
altname enp0s3
3: ens9: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:1a:4a:16:01:98 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
altname enp0s9
inet 10.216.50.200/24 brd 10.216.50.255 scope global noprefixroute ens9
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
What's going wrong?
Kind regards
Margit
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: