Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve project-awareness of network table's "Used by" #532

Open
lorumic opened this issue Nov 14, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Improve project-awareness of network table's "Used by" #532

lorumic opened this issue Nov 14, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
Enhancement New feature or request Good first issue Good for newcomers Needs UX input

Comments

@lorumic
Copy link
Contributor

lorumic commented Nov 14, 2023

Currently, the "Used by" column in the Network table is not project-aware. It only reports the total number of instances/profiles using the network, without giving information of how many instances/profiles in the current project use that network - which is the information that the user most likely wants to know. See the problem in action in the screen capture below, which also shows how this is different from the storage page, where both the "local" and "total" figures are shown:

Peek 2023-11-14 09-54

@lorumic lorumic added Enhancement New feature or request Good first issue Good for newcomers Needs UX input labels Nov 14, 2023
@edlerd
Copy link
Collaborator

edlerd commented Nov 14, 2023

The used by concept from storage does not directly apply to networks. Because networks can be referenced from two different types: instances and profiles. There might be a way to reflect that in the network list. Probably needs some thinking first before implementation.

@lorumic
Copy link
Contributor Author

lorumic commented Nov 14, 2023

The used by concept from storage does not directly apply to networks.

I know that they are 2 different concepts. It should still be project-aware. That total number is not nearly as useful as the number of instances and profiles in the current context (project).

Probably needs some thinking first before implementation.

Hence the "Needs UX input" label that I put.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement New feature or request Good first issue Good for newcomers Needs UX input
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants