Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modeling the OSS Standard in Archimate #91

Open
KingBain opened this issue Sep 25, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Modeling the OSS Standard in Archimate #91

KingBain opened this issue Sep 25, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@KingBain
Copy link
Contributor

KingBain commented Sep 25, 2019

<pressed enter before I was finished typing so this is all appearing as an edit :( >

This is a bit of an evening project for me, but I think it could benefit alot of GC architects who have to deal with policies coming out of TBS.

Using the text from https://canada-ca.github.io/open-source-logiciel-libre/en/open-source-standards.html

I did a first-pass(technically a second pass) and modeled out how I thought the standard looked like as an architect in archimate.

The model can be visualized here https://kingbain.github.io/OSS-Model/

I basically deconstructed the activity of creating the standard as well as created lists of requirements, criteria and a principle that basically represent the standard in its peices. Linked them all together using Archimate notation.

If anyone is interested in enhancing the model, you can access it via Archi and the Collaboration plugin

My question for the authors though, is how do you plan to link the Standard to the other section of the document. Does my model make sense, where is it missing information ?

Specifically ...
Prior to Starting
Use of Open Source Software
Contribution to Open Source Software
Publication of Open Source Code

Will those be part of the standard ? How will those section be consumed ?

@KingBain KingBain changed the title Modeling the OSS Standard so architects can use it Modeling the OSS Standard in Archimate Sep 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant