You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is there a need to mention any GC requirements for business review of intended contribution to ensure IP protection? For example, guidance can say any bug fixes, don't require GC business review. However, for any substantial contributions that include new features, a chat with GC business leader/legal team may be required?
Add some additional guidance on how to contribute with impact. Questions to ask such as:
What are the coding conventions of this community?
Is there a roadmap that includes your direction?
Has your proposal come up before?
Is the project actively maintained?
For small changes including bug fixes --> simple pull requests
For large contributions --> engage community first to understand their interest and get any feedback before spending significant time and effort on the contribution
Communities may have different forms of engagement: creating an issue in GitHub, mailing list, Slack channel or some discussion channel
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, very good point. Feature contribution Vs bug fix, documentation and
others have different involvment levels.
The process may need additional guidance for departments.
Le jeu. 28 mars 2019 10 h 47, NoureenS <[email protected]> a écrit :
For section:
https://github.com/canada-ca/open-source-logiciel-libre/blob/master/en/guides/contributing-to-open-source-software.md#verify-contributing-process-and-policies
Is there a need to mention any GC requirements for business review of
intended contribution to ensure IP protection? For example, guidance can
say any bug fixes, don't require GC business review. However, for any
substantial contributions that include new features, a chat with GC
business leader/legal team may be required?
Add some additional guidance on how to contribute with impact. Questions
to ask such as:
- What are the coding conventions of this community?
- Is there a roadmap that includes your direction?
- Has your proposal come up before?
- Is the project actively maintained?
For small changes including bug fixes --> simple pull requests
For large contributions --> engage community first to understand their
interest and get any feedback before spending significant time and effort
on the contribution
Communities may have different forms of engagement: creating an issue in
GitHub, mailing list, Slack channel or some discussion channel
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#52>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABnJ5XfayAEar9J_NtrrTiQTDyTlYyCBks5vbNYbgaJpZM4cQWVA>
.
For section: https://github.com/canada-ca/open-source-logiciel-libre/blob/master/en/guides/contributing-to-open-source-software.md#verify-contributing-process-and-policies
Is there a need to mention any GC requirements for business review of intended contribution to ensure IP protection? For example, guidance can say any bug fixes, don't require GC business review. However, for any substantial contributions that include new features, a chat with GC business leader/legal team may be required?
Add some additional guidance on how to contribute with impact. Questions to ask such as:
For small changes including bug fixes --> simple pull requests
For large contributions --> engage community first to understand their interest and get any feedback before spending significant time and effort on the contribution
Communities may have different forms of engagement: creating an issue in GitHub, mailing list, Slack channel or some discussion channel
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: