Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should SAML authentication responses be signed? #10

Open
harrdou opened this issue Sep 17, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Should SAML authentication responses be signed? #10

harrdou opened this issue Sep 17, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
credential authentication Issue related to credential authentication identity authentication Issue related to identity authenticaton SAML Issue related to the SAML profiles

Comments

@harrdou
Copy link
Collaborator

harrdou commented Sep 17, 2018

The Kantara interop profile now mandates the signing of SAML Response messages while making the signing of Assertions optional. This is the opposite of what the eGov 2.0 (and CATS 2.0) profiles required.

Is there any compelling reason why we should we move CATS in the same direction? Perhaps just for identity authentication?
@harrdou harrdou added SAML Issue related to the SAML profiles credential authentication Issue related to credential authentication identity authentication Issue related to identity authenticaton labels Sep 17, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
credential authentication Issue related to credential authentication identity authentication Issue related to identity authenticaton SAML Issue related to the SAML profiles
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@harrdou