You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is sort of a question and a bug report at the same time.
As far as I know 2d should be ignored, and 2id used/recommended instead, as that has both GPU and side-channel attack resistance.
2i lacks the memory dependence, thus it's easily parallelizable (so less GPU attack resistance).
Could someone clarify this? (Basically the question is, does 2id suffers more from it being both data dependent, thus sort of "side-channel attack"-able, than gain from being data dependent, thus more GPU attack resistant?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
This is sort of a question and a bug report at the same time.
As far as I know 2d should be ignored, and 2id used/recommended instead, as that has both GPU and side-channel attack resistance.
2i lacks the memory dependence, thus it's easily parallelizable (so less GPU attack resistance).
Could someone clarify this? (Basically the question is, does 2id suffers more from it being both data dependent, thus sort of "side-channel attack"-able, than gain from being data dependent, thus more GPU attack resistant?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: