You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are some barriers that will need to be overcome before Genbank format (or EMBL) can be supported for output.
Genbank supports a limited number of feature types, genomic islands not being one of them.
I emailed the NIH requesting advice on how to store unsupported features and they recommended using the misc_feature feature type. ex:
This is not ideal as it places structured data in a free form text field.
If genomic islands can accurately be referred to as mobile elements then another feature was recommended:
mobile_element 3190..57412
/note="Integrative Element (IE)"
/mobile_element_type="other:Acinetobacter Genomic
Island 1 (AGI1)"
but this does not contain structured data identifying it as a genomic island.
My alternative proposal is:
mobile_element 3190..57412
/note="Integrative Element (IE)"
/mobile_element_type="other:genomic_island"
/standard_name="Acinetobacter Genomic
Island 1 (AGI1)"
This conforms to the Genbank standard here: http://www.insdc.org/files/feature_table.html
The mobile_element_type feature qualifier is defined as semi-structured data and genomic_island is the appropriate term from the Sequence Ontology. The Sequence Ontology also defines genomic_island as a descendant of mobile_genetic_element.
There are some barriers that will need to be overcome before Genbank format (or EMBL) can be supported for output.
Genbank supports a limited number of feature types, genomic islands not being one of them.
I emailed the NIH requesting advice on how to store unsupported features and they recommended using the
misc_feature
feature type. ex:This is not ideal as it places structured data in a free form text field.
If genomic islands can accurately be referred to as mobile elements then another feature was recommended:
but this does not contain structured data identifying it as a genomic island.
My alternative proposal is:
This conforms to the Genbank standard here: http://www.insdc.org/files/feature_table.html
The
mobile_element_type
feature qualifier is defined as semi-structured data andgenomic_island
is the appropriate term from the Sequence Ontology. The Sequence Ontology also definesgenomic_island
as a descendant ofmobile_genetic_element
.The other major barrier is that the stitcher currently generates invalid Genbank files. See brinkmanlab/galaxy-tools#5 and brinkmanlab/galaxy-tools#6 . The first linked issue could be resolved with brinkmanlab/galaxy-tools#8 but I doubt the second issue would be.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: