Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider converting codebase to async #106

Open
briantist opened this issue Oct 8, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Consider converting codebase to async #106

briantist opened this issue Oct 8, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@briantist
Copy link
Owner

Probably a big project but not sure.

Might be a good time to look at converting from Flask to FastAPI.
We could also look more seriously at using antsibull-core as an upstream galaxy client.

Since we rely so much on dohq_artifactory though, it may end up not being that useful. because that library is not async, and our slowest calls are probably all in that library.

We could implement our own artifactory client instead. I don't really want to do that, but the APIs we need are quite limited. Not needing to follow pathlib semantics would also be nice, much easier to do testing, gains in efficiency...

Not really planning to do this any time soon but recording some thoughts.

@briantist briantist added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant