You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For example, dimensionality, number of numerical vs. categorical features, and if possible, some notion of complexity for each of the tasks (an example would be a comparison against random search performance)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your interest in our benchmark! You can get a detailed review of the datasets contained in the benchmark that we are using in our research in our whitepaper here: https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.08450.
Thanks, found the information I was looking for. I noticed that the focus is largely on one-shot (offline) design. Do you think these are suitable benchmarks for adaptive design (online) versions as well?
For example, dimensionality, number of numerical vs. categorical features, and if possible, some notion of complexity for each of the tasks (an example would be a comparison against random search performance)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: