Sources file names containig a $ are not supported

[sapetnioc]

In QualiCATI project, there are the following Java files in a share sub-directory :

-rw-rw-r-- 1 yann yann  214 oct.   1  2021 'ParforProgressMonitor$1.class'
-rw-rw-r-- 1 yann yann 1499 oct.   1  2021 'ParforProgressMonitor$ProgServer$1.class'
-rw-rw-r-- 1 yann yann 3542 oct.   1  2021 'ParforProgressMonitor$ProgServer.class'
-rw-rw-r-- 1 yann yann  244 oct.   1  2021 'ParforProgressMonitor$ProgThing.class'
-rw-rw-r-- 1 yann yann  908 oct.   1  2021 'ParforProgressMonitor$ProgWorker.class'
-rw-rw-r-- 1 yann yann  921 oct.   1  2021  ParforProgressMonitor.class
-rw-rw-r-- 1 yann yann 6016 oct.   1  2021  ParforProgressMonitor.java

The $* parts probably gets interpreted somewhere with the following results:

• The creation of a dev environment from scratch fails during the first build because two files have the same name once $*is interpreted.
• Re-running build raises no error but the final links in build directory are bad:

lrwxrwxrwx 1 yann yann  129 janv. 30 11:52 ParforProgressMonitor.class -> ../../../../../../../../src/qualicati/share/matlab/Diffusion/NODDI_toolbox_v1.01/ParforProgMonv2/java/ParforProgressMonitor.class
lrwxrwxrwx 1 yann yann  128 janv. 27 09:41 ParforProgressMonitor.java -> ../../../../../../../../src/qualicati/share/matlab/Diffusion/NODDI_toolbox_v1.01/ParforProgMonv2/java/ParforProgressMonitor.java
lrwxrwxrwx 1 yann yann  138 janv. 30 11:52 ParforProgressMonitorrogServer.class -> ../../../../../../../../src/qualicati/share/matlab/Diffusion/NODDI_toolbox_v1.01/ParforProgMonv2/java/ParforProgressMonitorrogServer.class
lrwxrwxrwx 1 yann yann  137 janv. 30 11:52 ParforProgressMonitorrogThing.class -> ../../../../../../../../src/qualicati/share/matlab/Diffusion/NODDI_toolbox_v1.01/ParforProgMonv2/java/ParforProgressMonitorrogThing.class
lrwxrwxrwx 1 yann yann  138 janv. 30 11:52 ParforProgressMonitorrogWorker.class -> ../../../../../../../../src/qualicati/share/matlab/Diffusion/NODDI_toolbox_v1.01/ParforProgMonv2/java/ParforProgressMonitorrogWorker.class

[denisri]

Is it something we must fix before the 5.1 release ?

[sapetnioc]

No. AFAIK, only CATI developers are facing the problem right now. They are using development environments.