We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It would be very useful to have an unary inverse operator.
Currently I’m either:
-1
xʸ
1
SWAP
÷
inverse()
but it would be nice to have a dedicated INV function. I imagine that shift + ÷ would be a convenient key sequence for the implementation.
INV
shift
What you do think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
It would be very useful to have an unary inverse operator.
Currently I’m either:
-1
to the pile and using thexʸ
function then,1
to the pile,SWAP
ing and then pressing÷
inverse()
function for Matrices in the Toolbox!but it would be nice to have a dedicated
INV
function. I imagine thatshift
+÷
would be a convenient key sequence for the implementation.What you do think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: