-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 110
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is there any plan for standardizing local_shared_ptr
?
#106
Comments
I'm not aware of any attempts to propose |
@pdimov: You think I remember what I was thinking in a parenthetical from two years ago? ;) Searching for "non-thread-safe shared_ptr" turns up some old discussions like
I might have been hazily remembering the 2015 and 2016 discussions, which were WG21-adjacent and didn't result in anything being adopted, but also weren't formal proposals either. |
Reading that SO link reminds me that I need to find the time to implement local_weak_ptr one of these days. |
I'm sorry for bothering here. This is not an issue for
boost::
local_shared_ptr
.Arthur O'Dwyer said that
local_shared_ptr
has been rejected for standardization (on std-proposals). But it seems that there's not even a P-paper for it.I wonder whether the standardization is really rejected, and if not, whether there is any plan for it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: