fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v7 (major) #1184
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
WalkthroughThe pull request involves an update to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)Client/package.json (2)
Your React ecosystem packages need a compatibility check:
Let's check the compatibility matrix: ✅ Verification successfulYo, the dependency check is clean like mom's kitchen! 🍝 After checking the dependencies, we can confirm everything's compatible:
No need to lose yourself in worry about peer dependencies - they're all good! 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check package.json in node_modules for peer dependency warnings
echo "Checking peer dependencies..."
# Look for react-router in MUI component dependencies
fd package.json node_modules/@mui -x grep -l "react-router"
# Check for any peer dependency warnings in package-lock.json
if [ -f package-lock.json ]; then
jq '.packages | .[] | select(.peerDependencies != null) | select(.peerDependencies["react-router"] != null or .peerDependencies["react-router-dom"] != null)' package-lock.json
fi
Length of output: 264 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual package.json for MUI dependencies and React Router
echo "Checking package.json for dependencies..."
cat Client/package.json | jq '.dependencies | with_entries(select(.key | startswith("@mui")))'
# Also check React version compatibility
echo -e "\nChecking React version..."
cat Client/package.json | jq '.dependencies | {react: .react, "react-dom": .["react-dom"]}'
# Let's see if there are any direct imports of react-router in MUI components
echo -e "\nChecking for react-router imports in the codebase..."
rg -l "from ['\"]react-router" --type ts --type tsx --type js --type jsx
Length of output: 827
Yo, heads up! Major breaking changes ahead in React Router v7! 🍝 This major version upgrade introduces significant changes that need attention:
Let's check for potential impact areas: Consider these migration steps:
Would you like me to help create a migration checklist issue? Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 PR Summary
- Business value and requirements alignment: This PR updates the
react-routerandreact-router-dompackages from v6.x to v7.0.0, which is a major version upgrade. This ensures that the application uses the latest routing library to benefit from new features, improvements, and bug fixes. - Key components modified: The
react-routerandreact-router-domdependencies in thepackage.jsonandpackage-lock.jsonfiles. - Impact assessment: Potential impacts on routing logic, component rendering, and overall application behavior.
- System dependencies and integration impacts: Integration with other dependencies using
react-routermight need updates.
1.2 Architecture Changes
- System design modifications: The routing logic and component interactions may change due to API updates in the new version.
- Component interactions: Routing components and their interactions might be affected.
- Integration points: Integration with other dependencies using
react-routermight need updates.
2. Detailed Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive
Core Logic Changes
- [File Path: Client/package.json] - [Dependency Updates]
- Submitted PR Code:
"react-router": "^7.0.0", "react-router-dom": "^7.0.0",
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The upgrade to v7.0.0 may introduce breaking changes that affect the routing logic and component rendering.
- Edge cases and error handling: New errors might be introduced due to API changes.
- Cross-component impact: Components relying on
react-routermay need adjustments. - Business logic considerations: Ensure that all business rules and user flows are maintained.
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
"react-router": "7.0.0", "react-router-dom": "7.0.0",
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Stability and predictability in dependency versions.
- Business value: Ensures consistent behavior and avoids unexpected issues.
- Risk assessment: Reduces the risk of inadvertent bugs from minor version updates.
- Submitted PR Code:
2.2 Implementation Quality
- Code organization and structure: Updating dependencies is simple and well-contained.
- Design patterns usage: Adheres to standard dependency management practices.
- Error handling approach: Needs thorough testing to cover new scenarios.
- Resource management: No immediate impact expected.
3. Critical Findings
3.1 Potential Issues
-
🔴 Critical Issues
- Major version upgrade might introduce breaking changes.
- Impact:
- Technical implications: Routing logic may break or behave unexpectedly.
- Business consequences: User flows and business logic might be disrupted.
- User experience effects: Potential downtime or broken functionality.
- Recommendation:
- Specific code changes: Test all routing components thoroughly.
- Configuration updates: Update routing configurations as needed.
- Testing requirements: Comprehensive integration and end-to-end testing.
-
🟡 Warnings
- Ensure backward compatibility and smooth migration.
- Potential risks:
- Performance implications: Potential performance issues due to new version.
- Maintenance overhead: Increased maintenance due to API changes.
- Future scalability: Ensure the new version supports future growth.
- Suggested improvements:
- Implementation approach: Thoroughly test all routes and components.
- Migration strategy: Plan a phased migration if necessary.
- Testing considerations: Unit and integration tests for all affected components.
3.2 Code Quality Concerns
- Maintainability aspects: Ensure the codebase remains maintainable.
- Readability issues: No immediate readability issues identified.
- Performance bottlenecks: Needs performance testing.
4. Security Assessment
4.1 Security Considerations
- Authentication/Authorization impacts: Ensure no security vulnerabilities are introduced.
- Data handling concerns: No immediate data handling concerns identified.
- Input validation: No immediate input validation concerns identified.
- Security best practices: Follow best practices for dependency management.
4.2 Vulnerability Analysis
- Potential security risks: Ensure no security vulnerabilities are introduced.
- Mitigation strategies: Thoroughly test all routing components.
- Security testing requirements: Conduct comprehensive integration and end-to-end testing.
5. Testing Strategy
5.1 Test Coverage
- Unit test analysis: Test all routing components.
- Integration test requirements: Test integration points with other dependencies.
- Edge cases coverage: Validate all edge cases.
5.2 Test Recommendations
Suggested Test Cases
// Example unit test for routing component
import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react';
import { BrowserRouter as Router, Route, Routes } from 'react-router-dom';
import HomePage from './HomePage';
test('renders home page', () => {
render(
<Router>
<Routes>
<Route path="/" element={<HomePage />} />
</Routes>
</Router>
);
expect(screen.getByText(/home page/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});- Coverage improvements: Ensure high test coverage.
- Performance testing needs: Measure performance pre and post-upgrade.
6. Documentation & Maintenance
- Documentation updates needed: Update documentation to reflect changes.
- Long-term maintenance considerations: Ensure the codebase remains maintainable.
- Technical debt and monitoring requirements: Document the upgrade process and any necessary changes.
7. Deployment & Operations
- Deployment impact and strategy: Ensure a smooth deployment process.
- Key operational considerations: Monitor performance post-upgrade.
8. Summary & Recommendations
8.1 Key Action Items
-
Critical changes required:
- Thoroughly test all routing components and update configurations as needed.
-
Important improvements suggested:
- Ensure backward compatibility and plan a phased migration if necessary.
- Conduct comprehensive integration and end-to-end testing.
-
Best practices to implement:
- Follow best practices for dependency management.
- Ensure no security vulnerabilities are introduced.
-
Cross-cutting concerns to address:
- Update documentation to reflect changes.
- Monitor performance post-upgrade.
8.2 Future Considerations
- Technical evolution path: Ensure the application benefits from new features and improvements while maintaining stability.
- Business capability evolution: Ensure all business rules and user flows are maintained.
- System integration impacts: Integration with other dependencies using
react-routermight need updates.
💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.
|
Tests only 70% passing, we'll wait on this |
Renovate Ignore NotificationBecause you closed this PR without merging, Renovate will ignore this update. You will not get PRs for any future If you accidentally closed this PR, or if you changed your mind: rename this PR to get a fresh replacement PR. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains the following updates:
^6.23.0->^7.0.0^6.23.1->^7.0.0Release Notes
remix-run/react-router (react-router)
v7.0.1Compare Source
v7.0.0: v7.0.0Compare Source
See the changelog for release notes: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#v700
remix-run/react-router (react-router-dom)
v7.0.1Compare Source
Patch Changes
[email protected]v7.0.0Compare Source
Major Changes
Remove the original
deferimplementation in favor of using raw promises via single fetch andturbo-stream. This removes these exports from React Router: (#11744)deferAbortedDeferredErrortype TypedDeferredDataUNSAFE_DeferredDataUNSAFE_DEFERRED_SYMBOL,Use
createRemixRouter/RouterProviderinentry.clientinstead ofRemixBrowser(#11469)Remove single_fetch future flag. (#11522)
Remove
future.v7_startTransitionflag (#11696)Remove
future.v7_normalizeFormMethodfuture flag (#11697)Allow returning
undefinedfrom actions and loaders (#11680)update minimum node version to 18 (#11690)
Remove
future.v7_prependBasenamefrom the ionternalized@remix-run/routerpackage (#11726)Remove
future.v7_throwAbortReasonfrom internalized@remix-run/routerpackage (#11728)Add
exportsfield to all packages (#11675)node package no longer re-exports from react-router (#11702)
updates the minimum React version to 18 (#11689)
future.v7_partialHydrationflag (#11725)<RouterProvider fallbackElement>propfallbackElementto ahydrateFallbackElement/HydrateFallbackon your root routefuture.v7_partialHydration(when usingfallbackElement),state.navigationwas populated during the initial loadfuture.v7_partialHydration,state.navigationremains in an"idle"state during the initial loadRemove
future.v7_fetcherPersistflag (#11731)Minor Changes
Link/NavLinkwhen using Remix SSR (#11402)ScrollRestorationso it can restore properly on an SSR'd document load (#11401)RouterProvider. When running from a Remix-SSR'd HTML payload with the properwindowvariables (__remixContext,__remixManifest,__remixRouteModules), you don't need to pass arouterprop andRouterProviderwill create therouterfor you internally. (#11396) (#11400)Patch Changes
RouterProviderinternals to reduce uneccesary re-renders (#11817)[email protected]Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.
This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.