was_destroyed was a highly misleading function name.

[dyxushuai]

Related: taikoxyz/raiko#395

revm/crates/database/src/states/account_status.rs

Lines 44 to 51 in dad766d

	pub fn was_destroyed(&self) -> bool {
	matches!(
	self,
	AccountStatus::Destroyed
	| AccountStatus::DestroyedChanged
	| AccountStatus::DestroyedAgain
	)
	}

DestroyedChanged doesn't mean the Account has been deleted. Is it designed like this?

[rakita]

Hm I see that it can be misleading, maybe better naming is ChangedAfterDestruction or DestroyedThanChanged, wdyt?

[dyxushuai]

Hm I see that it can be misleading, maybe better naming is ChangedAfterDestruction or DestroyedThanChanged, wdyt?

Breaking down the DestroyedChanged status into more detailed segments is always preferable!