forked from luke-jr/libbase58
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 200
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Decide future direction of library #6
Comments
Any thoughts, @CoperNick8 @holland01 @randolf @sipa @laanwj @e271828- @voisine ? |
I tend to agree - base58 has so few stand-alone uses outside of bitcoin,
that including bechs32 functionality and making it a combined library makes
sense imo.
…On Tue, Jul 3, 2018, 13:00 Luke Dashjr ***@***.***> wrote:
Any thoughts, @CoperNick8 <https://github.com/CoperNick8> @holland01
<https://github.com/holland01> @randolf <https://github.com/randolf> @sipa
<https://github.com/sipa> @laanwj <https://github.com/laanwj> @e271828-
<https://github.com/e271828-> @voisine <https://github.com/voisine> ?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#6 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAHutvLx1mbENiNpOK_tUnmHDZo9wzGSks5uC1z6gaJpZM4SvWAL>
.
|
This seems reasonable to me as well. |
I do not know. I'm new. I just add that I thought that libbase58 is part of the Bitcoin Core, but now I see that Bitcoin Core has its own base58.cpp . |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
With the adoption of Bech32, there is likely to be no need for a Base58-specific library.
Would it make sense to transform libbase58 into a generic libbitcoinaddress library, adding Bech32 and perhaps Bitcoin Script generation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: