You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Yes, changing None to 0 indeed does not make a huge difference, does it? Well, except for breaking our tests and taking me half an hour to discover who's responsible (scikit? sklearn? pandas?) and what changed and why. Now I only need to make our tests version-dependent and we're fine again. Thank you, thank you, thank you.
I do not have a habit of swearing, but I might start if I keep trying to keep the pace with the ever-changing scipy, sklearn and pandas.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
janezd
added
bug report
Bug is reported by user, not yet confirmed by the core team
and removed
bug report
Bug is reported by user, not yet confirmed by the core team
labels
Oct 15, 2024
Hard-working maintainers of Python scientific stack decided to change the result of AUC when only one class is present in test data: scikit-learn/scikit-learn#27412, merged two days ago (here: https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/27412/files#diff-4eb3c023f8a3f088d62208f6adbd02b6df5196de2257ccd228dffc972c964634R383).
Yes, changing
None
to0
indeed does not make a huge difference, does it? Well, except for breaking our tests and taking me half an hour to discover who's responsible (scikit? sklearn? pandas?) and what changed and why. Now I only need to make our tests version-dependent and we're fine again. Thank you, thank you, thank you.I do not have a habit of swearing, but I might start if I keep trying to keep the pace with the ever-changing scipy, sklearn and pandas.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: