You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 9, 2023. It is now read-only.
I tend to work with very large OTU tables that contain results from multiple studies. Often times, my first step in my workflow is to whittle the OTU table down to just the samples I'm interested in using filter_samples_from_OTU_table.py - in some cases, this leaves OTUs in my table that have no abundance across any of the remaining samples.
It might be nice to have a flag to remove those OTUs from the table in the same sample filtering step instead of having to call filter_otus_from_otu_table.py with the -n 1 option.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
👍 Note that we aren't adding new features to QIIME 1 (except for fixing critical bugs). QIIME 2 will automatically remove empty samples or features when using qiime feature-table filter-features and qiime feature-table filter-samples, respectively. QIIME 2 is alpha software but you might consider trying it out.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
I tend to work with very large OTU tables that contain results from multiple studies. Often times, my first step in my workflow is to whittle the OTU table down to just the samples I'm interested in using
filter_samples_from_OTU_table.py
- in some cases, this leaves OTUs in my table that have no abundance across any of the remaining samples.It might be nice to have a flag to remove those OTUs from the table in the same sample filtering step instead of having to call
filter_otus_from_otu_table.py
with the-n 1
option.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: