You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The goal here would be for the stable release to reliably correspond to the latest version of the BIDS specification, while dev can be updated and used continuously, with a warning that it contains experimental features that may be removed before a stable release.
We would use patch releases to fix bugs in the stable validator, but not to add any new features, which will be largely helped by #85 allowing us to upgrade the schema without adopting unreleased features.
This is done, except that we are using main and dev instead of stable and main. We also are not pushing to gh-pages on a continuous basis, since I found a way (#96) to avoid committing the contents by building from two branches.
These are currently triggered by release or manual trigger. Is that good enough, or do we want to automate more frequent builds, and if so what should be the stable target?
This is a redux of bids-standard/legacy-validator#1227, in light of #85, also with branching diagrams.
I propose that we have the following URLs:
dev
)The goal here would be for the stable release to reliably correspond to the latest version of the BIDS specification, while
dev
can be updated and used continuously, with a warning that it contains experimental features that may be removed before a stable release.We would use patch releases to fix bugs in the stable validator, but not to add any new features, which will be largely helped by #85 allowing us to upgrade the schema without adopting unreleased features.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: