Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Different requirements for PAMS vs grants.gov submissions #6

Open
bernhold opened this issue Dec 20, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Different requirements for PAMS vs grants.gov submissions #6

bernhold opened this issue Dec 20, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@bernhold
Copy link
Owner

bernhold commented Dec 20, 2022

FOAs I've looked at consistently differ in requirements depending on whether you're submitting to PAMS or grants.gov.

  1. Project summary is one page total in PAMS, while in grants.gov you can have one page for the team and one full page for the abstract.
  2. In PAMS, bio sketches and current and pending support are appendices 1 and 2, whereas in grants.gov, they're entered separately from the main proposal document.

It should not be hard to add a toggle, probably in CONFIG-proposal.tex, to indicate intended destination and have the template adapt accordingly. (Or it could be done manually.)

For the bio sketches and C&P, we might be able to provide two options for ordering:

  1. The order of CONFIG-investigators.csv (the recommendation is by institution with PI first)
  2. Sorted by last name

Note that on most filesystems, case of filenames is important, and this is a consideration in naming conventions for the bios and C&P files. I had some problems trying to use \MakeLowercase.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant