Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

the Impact of Image Clarity in the Dataset on Work Effectiveness #11

Open
Sylver-Chen opened this issue Sep 14, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Comments

@Sylver-Chen
Copy link

Hello author, I have checked the dataset you provided. Most of the images are blurry, but a few are clear. If all the images in the dataset were blurry, would your work still work?

@benhenryL
Copy link
Owner

Hi, thanks for your attention to our work.

Only blurry images are used for training and those few clear images are for evaluation (as a groundtruth clean image to evaluate model performance under some metrics).

Hope this helps and please let me know if you have any other questions.

Thanks!

@RJL-666666
Copy link

Hello, could you explain why the PSNR value I obtained by running the dataset from this paper in the original 3DGS is much higher than the one reported in your paper?

@benhenryL
Copy link
Owner

Hello, I think this is because the original 3DGS is unstable when trained with degraded images (blur, aberration, etc.).
Hence, the result PSNR can fluctuate as it depends on per-pixel loss, but I don’t think there will be a noticeable gap in LPIPS among different runs.
At the time of writing, we reported 3D-GS results with only one run, but even if it can reach higher PSNR after several runs, it still cannot deblur the scene and will be much worse than ours or other deblurring frameworks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants