-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
project_kids_items #727
Comments
hi @ben-domingue i have a question i saw wave has these values codebook: |
@saviranadela let me dive in |
I actually think that this just needs to be redone from the ground-up. The description reads:
These data were processed from before we were being as strict about 'different scales -> different tables'. But I think we can redo this somewhat efficiently using the original code: |
got it! will re-do from the ground-up |
@ben-domingue one more question: i see that one item level could have multiple types of waves: |
let me see if i follow: i think the issue here is that they are discussing things in a confusing way. they talk about grades and waves and it isn't really clear what is going on. wave 3 presumably occurs after wave 1. but what does that have to do with grade 1/3 followup? it's kind of difficult to know. does this seem right? my sense is that wave should be ordinal given that it captures a temporal element of data collection and time is always ordered. what if we split the data here into the chunk we can order by wave (so the first two told rows) and that we can order by 'follow' (so the latter two?). or, failing that, maybe i should email the authors asking for clarity? |
@ben-domingue do you mean splitting them like this? |
code:
|
woo boy. this data is tricky! let's focus on just one pair:
from the index, these should be: [going to followup below] |
what i think is happening:
excellent work @saviranadela ! |
my guess is that 'grade' is one study and 'wave' is another. yes, it might be! agree with you. but still, we can’t be 100% sure what was going on just yet. either way, i think splitting those waves is already a good move. however, i am happy to email the project PIC if you think it’s necessary! |
i'm willing to live on the edge. i feel pretty confident that is the right thing! unless you remain dubious @saviranadela i would be ok processing the ones we have here :) |
sounds good! PR: #746 |
thanks @saviranadela ! adding these now |
this one needs to be fixed. in particular, i want to uncouple the wave and person id but i also want the wave to be ordinal numeric values. so i think we need to go back to the code.
table: https://redivis.com/datasets/as2e-cv7jb41fd/tables/r4fk-ckdx7s2mr?tablesList-search=project_ki&tablesList-orderDirection=DESC&tablesList-orderBy=relevance&tablesList-tableToken=tablesList#cells
see also: https://domingue-lab.slack.com/archives/C05AKJGU3UJ/p1733849254844299?thread_ts=1733766196.979549&cid=C05AKJGU3UJ
@saviranadela & @KingArthur0205 any chance one of you could take a look at this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: