You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
result
2019's return shown as 20%, X_years_ago returns shown as = -100%
result with fix of issue 4 of #4 (comment)
all returns shown as -100%
The correct return is ~1852657.75%
I am not sure
if script crashes/fails to calculate the number
or if it simply can't display the number in return table cause it is such a large number
And though such a large return number is meaningless and not sustainable current outputs are deceptive, i think displaying order of magnitude 10^6% will be more appropriate.
(similarly if it's -1852657.75% then -10^6%)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
gety9
changed the title
returns of -100.0% for short durations.
returns of -100.0% for short durations / large return numbers.
Sep 19, 2021
gety9
changed the title
returns of -100.0% for short durations / large return numbers.
returns of -100.0% for short durations / large return numbers
Sep 19, 2021
simple.beancount
conf-simple
result
2019's return shown as 20%, X_years_ago returns shown as = -100%
result with fix of issue 4 of #4 (comment)
all returns shown as -100%
The correct return is ~1852657.75%
I am not sure
And though such a large return number is meaningless and not sustainable current outputs are deceptive, i think displaying order of magnitude
10^6%
will be more appropriate.(similarly if it's -1852657.75% then
-10^6%
)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: