You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In addition to the Query Field Type (alternative name: dynamic relations, it may be valuable to look into a standardized handling of children.
It could be as simple as a _children_ property on all container items that list DomainContent` items that are subitems of the content (which location ? all of them ?)
The children type can be tested with ... on ArticleType, as a typical container won't contain dozens of items type (it would indicate a bad modelling of the repository).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In addition to the Query Field Type (alternative name: dynamic relations, it may be valuable to look into a standardized handling of children.
It could be as simple as a
_children_ property on all container items that list
DomainContent` items that are subitems of the content (which location ? all of them ?)The children type can be tested with
... on ArticleType
, as a typical container won't contain dozens of items type (it would indicate a bad modelling of the repository).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: