You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think it'll be tough to combine profile likelihood CIs with sandwich estimators; in my very limited knowledge/experience, sandwich estimators etc. are very much developed in the Wald sampling framework - to that extent, your hack seems reasonable. To the extent that the log-likelihood surface is far from quadratic, I'm not even aware of the theory that would explain how to adjust it for clustered data/heteroscedasticity/etc. (except for building a model with explicit random effects, which is another can of worms ...) - not that that means it doesn't exist ...
After doing some reading: composite likelihoods have been used in this context. In particular, Chandler and Bate (2007) developed methods for "stretching" the likelihood to use a chi-squared distribution, with an implementation in the chandwich package on CRAN.
That said, I suggest you close this issue - I can use the multivariate delta method with the sandwich estimator, rather than using the profile likelihood. Thank you for your comments.
Ben,
How difficult would it be to adapt an
mle2
object for clustered data using a sandwich estimator?In
rstpm2
, I currently replace thevcov
slot with a sandwich estimator, but this feels like a hack. It certainly gives the wrong estimate forconfint
.Would you be able to give some guidance for where I should start with
confint
(and other functions that depend on the profile likelihood), please?Sincerely, Mark.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: