-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reviving DNxHR support? #60
Comments
There's no philosophical reason for not supporting it. It's not a format that I've needed in my work and so can't spend time resolving issues and completing submissions; it's up to the contributor to address the comments I had in that thread. It's also more complicated now that I don't have the same access to Avid editors, which makes it harder to validate files. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Howdy all - Just curious if there's been any ongoing discussion around DNxHR since Thomas Gritzan did his work a few years ago (thread, repo)? I'd love to make use of bmxtranswrap for generating DNxHR opatom files, and looked at pulling Thomas' branch into the current project - it seems mostly fine, though the files aren't working in Avid at the moment.
I couldn't find much more discussion about DNxHR though, so I'm curious if there's a philosophical reason it isn't covered in this project?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: