You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a list of errata in "Coding Interest Rate Derivatives" edition 1.
p12: "dual numbers also form a field": this is not true due to the many zeros (which are not the defined zero element), e.g. $0+1e_x$ or $0+4e_x$ which do not have a multiplicative inverse. Computationally (and this is why they still work for AD purposes), they form a pseudo-field, since any element which would fail computationally in the real domain, also fails in the dual domain: e.g. 1/0 is undefined and 1/(0+2e_x) is also undefined. Any dual that does not have 0 as the real component has a multiplicative inverse. This error does not have any knock on effects.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a list of errata in "Coding Interest Rate Derivatives" edition 1.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: