You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In some cases there might be databook quantities only used for calibration/validation purposes. At the moment if a quantity can appear in the datebook, a value must be provided for it. Consider whether to (a) allow marking quantities in the framework as 'optional' which will result in successful validation of a datebook without data for such quantities, and/or (b) automatically considering a quantity optional if it is not used to inform (directly or indirectly) any transitions. Some considerations are
For compartments and characteristics, inputs could only be optional if the setup weight is 0
How likely is it that downstream user code relies on data being available for quantities that don't inform transitions. Would it be useful for a framework author to be able to guarantee that data of some sort exists for a given quantity (that would be an argument in favour of (a) over (b)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In some cases there might be databook quantities only used for calibration/validation purposes. At the moment if a quantity can appear in the datebook, a value must be provided for it. Consider whether to (a) allow marking quantities in the framework as 'optional' which will result in successful validation of a datebook without data for such quantities, and/or (b) automatically considering a quantity optional if it is not used to inform (directly or indirectly) any transitions. Some considerations are
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: