Start gathering information about who uses the specification

[derberg]

Reason/Context

We know AsyncAPI is widely adopted by users but we do not have a way for users to tell us about it. Open question is if we should have one section with users or rather maybe Used by and Products integrations so community not only see how others use it but also how to integrate it to enrich products for their customers.

Description

• Have a list of users and make it easy for anyone to be added to the list through PR
• Such a list would feature the logo of the company, short description of use case or link to a blog post if possible. For example the logo of Axway with short description and link to https://devblog.axway.com/integration/asyncapi/. Something similar is on Kyma website https://kyma-project.io/#used-by.
• Have list of users in README.md too?

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴
It will be closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with detailed explanation.
Thank you for your contributions ❤️

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴
It will be closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with detailed explanation.
Thank you for your contributions ❤️

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴
It will be closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with detailed explanation.
Thank you for your contributions ❤️

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴
It will be closed in 60 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with detailed explanation.
Thank you for your contributions ❤️

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴
It will be closed in 60 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with detailed explanation.
Thank you for your contributions ❤️

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴
It will be closed in 60 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with detailed explanation.
Thank you for your contributions ❤️

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴
It will be closed in 60 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with detailed explanation.
Thank you for your contributions ❤️

[AceTheCreator]

@derberg I want to pick this up.

[derberg]

this one is pretty old 😄 I think better would be to devide it:

• have on a website info about companies/vendors that build tools on AsyncAPI, like Axway, WSO2, SmartBear, SAP and others
• and list of users would be populated using API mentioned in Integrate or re-implement APIs.guru asyncapi-directory #204

so we have users and vendors separated. What do you think?

[AceTheCreator]

@derberg you're right, but does it has to be on a different route? I'd suggest it's on the same route, then we'll have 2 tabs that when clicked will change the view "Companies", "Users"

[derberg]

I personally prefer one under another than tabs, people do not click tabs really. Sections should be called "Vendors using AsyncAPI" and "Users of AsyncAPI"

[AceTheCreator]

@derberg guess you're right about that. But we'll be referencing each link from the homepage right?

[derberg]

But we'll be referencing each link from the homepage right?

what do you mean?
we should have these sections on homepage imho

[AceTheCreator]

@derberg Awesome!

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

[derberg]

basic work started #921

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

[sambhavgupta0705]

@derberg I am closing this issue as it is pretty old and we also have our first case study also on the website

We can reopen this if you find this relevant

[sambhavgupta0705]

@derberg I am closing this issue as it is pretty old and we also have our first case study also on the website

We can reopen this if you find this relevant