-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 676
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Perfect workflow for notifying triagers #3214
Comments
Hello, I looked up the logs of the notify-triager workflow. Is this error relevant to the issue? or we have some other issue with the workflow? |
need to look into it |
Bounty Issue's service commentText labels: @asyncapi/bounty_team The Bounty Program is not a Mentorship Program. The accepted level of Bounty Program Participants is Middle/Senior.Regular contributors should explain in meaningful words how they are going to approach the resolution process when expressing a desire to work on this Bounty Issue. |
Hi team, I would like to take on this issue. I have good experience with GitHub Actions from my GSoC work, where I built the CI/CD pipeline for the JSON Schema website. Thank you! : ) |
Hi @anshgoyalevil , i would like to take this up |
@aeworxet I would like to work on this issue under bounty program |
@sambhavgupta0705 is an AsyncAPI Maintainer specified in https://raw.githubusercontent.com/asyncapi/community/master/MAINTAINERS.yaml, so they fall under the first category in the prioritization list. |
Bounty Issue's Timeline
Please note that the dates given represent deadlines, not specific dates, so if the goal is reached sooner, it's better.Keep in mind the responsibility for violations of the Timeline. |
Hey!! |
Upon request of the Bounty Program Participant (@sambhavgupta0705, Bounty Issue's Timeline Extended
Please note that the dates given represent deadlines, not specific dates, so if the goal is reached sooner, it's better.Keep in mind the responsibility for violations of the Timeline. |
@sambhavgupta0705 ( |
1 similar comment
@sambhavgupta0705 ( |
Why do we need this improvement?
Currently the workflow for notifying triage maintainers of code and doc is not working properly for which we need to setup a perfect workflow to notify triage maintainers
How will this change help?
It will help us in maintaining the code review architecture in a better way
How could it be implemented/designed?
Need to setup a workflow for this
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: