feat: gsoc project - add autofix feature

[FelicixAwe]

Description
This PR includes the implementation of autofix feature of the GSoC 24' project.
Project idea link click here
High-level overview:
Create asyncapi-ruleset and fixers for the rule. Diagnostic info is provided by Spectral.

Fixers and corresponding asyncapi-rule

• addDescription: asyncapi-operation-description
• addField: asyncapi-info-contact-properties, asyncapi-info-contact, asyncapi-info-description, asyncapi-info-license
• deleteEndingSlash: asyncapi-channel-no-trailing-slash, asyncapi-server-no-trailing-slash
• deleteEmptyParam: asyncapi-channel-no-empty-parameter
• deleteID: asyncapi-message-messageId-uniqueness
• deleteRepeatedTags: asyncapi-tags-uniqueness
• deleteRepeatedTags: asyncapi-tags-uniqueness
• deleteEmptyVariables: asyncapi-server-no-empty-variable
• updateURL: asyncapi-server-no-empty-variable
• latestVersionUpdate: asyncapi-latest-version

Unit Test
Unit tests is included in /src/functions/test, to run unit testing:
npm test

Related issue(s)

None

[github-actions]

Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for creating your first pull request. Please check out our contributors guide useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
6 Security Hotspots
39.7% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[Pakisan]

@ivangsa @derberg hi!

Any concerns about implementation?

[derberg]

@Pakisan sorry but I'm not a real maintainer here, just helping @ivangsa if there are some automation related topics, or extension publish pipeline. I have zero opinion to share. It's the same if it comes to my support for jasyncapi 😃 and I'm definitely happy to step down if anyone can take up my work and @ivangsa is happy about it

[ivangsa]

hi @Pakisan, sorry I didn't saw this in time..

I will find some time this week to review..

[ivangsa]

@FelicixAwe How can I test this? do you have a project with asyncapi.yml that can be autofixed

I have a vscode workspace with a .spectral.yml with the following content:

extends: ["spectral:oas", "spectral:asyncapi", "spectral:arazzo"]

I couldn't manage to trigger any of the autofix rule contained in src/ruleset/asyncapi-rules.ts

Does this support only asyncapi v2 ?

How do you match the spectral "problem code" here? is it matched by the content of the description?

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
6 Security Hotspots
39.7% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[FelicixAwe]

Hi.

Yes it supports v2.

@FelicixAwe How can I test this? do you have a project with asyncapi.yml that can be autofixed

I have a vscode workspace with a .spectral.yml with the following content:

extends: ["spectral:oas", "spectral:asyncapi", "spectral:arazzo"]

I couldn't manage to trigger any of the autofix rule contained in src/ruleset/asyncapi-rules.ts

Does this support only asyncapi v2 ?

How do you match the spectral "problem code" here? is it matched by the content of the description?

[ivangsa]

@FelicixAwe How can I test this? do you have a project with asyncapi.yml that can be autofixed