Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

makes sense to have hasReply #116

Open
derberg opened this issue Apr 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

makes sense to have hasReply #116

derberg opened this issue Apr 8, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented Apr 8, 2024

use case https://github.com/asyncapi/markdown-template/pull/523/files#diff-a77ecd4c1f96130ae45b0bf71058686ad44f1b381f5f87fd567dddb83eea3558

better than doing operation.reply() !== undefined

maybe even operation.type() would make sense, to return not only send or receive but other type depending if reply is there
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@derberg