You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I ran Deleterious on simulated datasets, with both versions 0.3.5c and 0.3.6.
I observed that 0.3.5c is much slower but also finds much better (in terms of RF distance to the true gene trees) trees than 0.3.6 and 0.3.7.
Is this expected? Are there any big difference between both versions?
Here is one example command line I use: java -Xms512m -Xmx1024m -jar prime_0.3.5c.jar Deleterious speciesTree.newick alignment.msa mapping.link -i 10000 -t 10 -s 42 --siteratecategories 4 -sm JC69 -o output
Adding more iterations does not fix the issue. I pick the resulting gene tree from the info file to compute the RF distance to the true tree.
Best,
Benoit
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I ran Deleterious on simulated datasets, with both versions 0.3.5c and 0.3.6.
I observed that 0.3.5c is much slower but also finds much better (in terms of RF distance to the true gene trees) trees than 0.3.6 and 0.3.7.
Is this expected? Are there any big difference between both versions?
Here is one example command line I use:
java -Xms512m -Xmx1024m -jar prime_0.3.5c.jar Deleterious speciesTree.newick alignment.msa mapping.link -i 10000 -t 10 -s 42 --siteratecategories 4 -sm JC69 -o output
Adding more iterations does not fix the issue. I pick the resulting gene tree from the info file to compute the RF distance to the true tree.
Best,
Benoit
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: