You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think it is an pity the first layers of an print mess up the complete estimated time for the rest of the print. Would it be possible to, in case you are using a static movement/.cws, to don't use the first layers for time estimation? (preferably even calculate the complete expected time for a .cws which should be calculatable by the gcode file)
Kind regards,
Robin
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You could certainly do that. The problem is that everyone has their own ideas of how to predict the end of the world, but so far I haven't seen anyone do a very good job of it. My theory thus far has been pretty simple. The server side is responsible for supplying the frontend a set of facts about a print job's progress. These facts currently includes things like:
totalSlices
currentSlice
currentSliceTime
averageSliceTime
startTime
elapsedTime
totalCost
currentSliceCost
You are attempting to take a very specific case(cws files) and build a rather complicated theory that may or may not end up being that accurate.
Calculated time will always be easier to calculate but each Raspberry Pi or any other computer will finish at different times which cannot be calculated any more
Hi,
I think it is an pity the first layers of an print mess up the complete estimated time for the rest of the print. Would it be possible to, in case you are using a static movement/.cws, to don't use the first layers for time estimation? (preferably even calculate the complete expected time for a .cws which should be calculatable by the gcode file)
Kind regards,
Robin
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: