-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Separate Web and API concepts? #542
Comments
I'm with you 100% and the next version will be API -only (or will have that as an option, anyway) |
Perhaps it's time for a pair of templates:
Thoughts? Add emoji to this comment. |
I think a single template would still be sufficient. If you only want the API, just delete the Web project. If you want the web, you would need an API to power it. The "add connected service" feature in VS would be able to connect the two... Or for a more independent version, a tool can generate the client from the API project. That's just my two cents though. Perhaps that's being " too clever " and two separate projects would suffice. |
Hey @ardalis! |
For sure! But it would also multiply the effort of maintaining the templates by N (where N is the number of variants). Unless I come up with some code generation approach or something that reduces that effort, I'm not sure how soon I'll be able to support that many variations. Since my own use cases recently are mostly APIs, I'm probably going to support that as the primary "default" version and provide instructions on how to add Razor Pages or MVC Views to that template if needed, is my current thought. Open to ideas and contributions, though. |
I think that it would benefit those using this project to have an option which is API only as opposed to a traditional Web project which also includes the API within.
Pulling out controllers and views which are redundant can be tedious.
If a web project is also desired, it could be also be included. It could take a "Connected Services" dependency on the API via it's generated Swagger document.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: