Accession spawn Digital Object

[kdimopulu]

No description provided.

[balmas]

Would a form ever have two dropdowns?

[donaldjosephsmith]

It certainly could. Though it would be a bit more verbose, it might be good to rename this as "clicks on the first dropdown" just to make what it is doing clear.

[blacksmith-welder]

Many sub-record forms can have an arbitrary amount of dropdown buttons.

I have already considered this, and I have intentionally left it as it is because, at this point, all the created records have strictly one entry in each sub-record form.
This applies to other fields related to sub-records.

My intention was to elaborate further, once we are going to write features with more than one entry in sub-record forms, to devote more time and focus on a solution on how to effectively implement this.

Probably we are going to use words like first, second, etc., but numbering has to be scoped to refer to the entry inside a sub-record form because it is going to be cumbersome and error-prone to manually count dropdown buttons and/or fields.

eg.: It is going to be something like:
the user clicks on the second dropdown in the third entry in the Agent Links form

My suggestion is to leave it like this for now, to create some headroom for conceiving a clear and concise solution for all sub-records if possible.

[donaldjosephsmith]

I'm ok with having just this one step definition that clicks the first entry in the subrecord form, and we can of course consider alternatives in the future as needed. I still would prefer it to be named as such (clicks on the first dropdown) just to avoid confusion, especially since it is a shared step definition that may be used in a variety of contexts (including by test authors that may not be familiar with the Capybara end of things).

[blacksmith-welder]

Done

[donaldjosephsmith]

Looks like there is now a small conflict that needs to be resolved.