You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Shouldn't we add the C4 approach by simon brown to the building blocks?
C4 = context, containers, components, classes
IMHO, if you are not experienced with the building blocks, this approach is really helpful -
level1 = context
level2 = containers (deployment units like .wars and .jars, filesystems, databases)
level3 = components
level4 = classes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
imho C4 mixes different things (esp. deployment and static code structure), whereas arc42 clearly separates those. The "containers" are something that imho should be treated seperately...
that is true - Ievel 2 nearly looks like a deployment diagram.
In some examples, he also adds too much detail for my taste - like port numbers...
But I can't think of a better structuring parameter for level 2...
Shouldn't we add the C4 approach by simon brown to the building blocks?
C4 = context, containers, components, classes
IMHO, if you are not experienced with the building blocks, this approach is really helpful -
level1 = context
level2 = containers (deployment units like .wars and .jars, filesystems, databases)
level3 = components
level4 = classes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: